The installation of elevators in old buildings requires more effort from the public sector

If there is no trusted third party on both sides to reconcile such conflicts, and relying solely on the households themselves, the two sides will always argue from the perspective of their own benefits, and the conflicts will be difficult to deal with.

The successful installation of elevators is a hot topic among the owners of Chengdu Huayang Jinrui Garden Community. The owners of high and low levels hold opinions. The low-level owners even demanded compensation from the high-level owners. The first floor was 300,000 yuan, the second floor was 200,000 yuan, and the third floor was 100,000 yuan. With regard to such a request, it is naturally difficult for high-rise owners to agree to it. Seeing that the installation of elevators plans to abort.

This situation has occurred in many cities. Many of the buildings built in the early years were used to deal with housing troubles. The simple building facilities and the absence of elevators are widespread. Twenty or thirty years ago, it was a joy for workers to get a set of residences. In addition, at first, the workers were widely young, and they didn't feel intolerable about climbing stairs. But as the residents get older, six or seven floors above and below become unacceptable responsibility. Installing elevators on old buildings is not only useless for low-rise residents, it may also affect the lighting and ventilation of the residences and reduce living comfort. Therefore, low-rise residents will have functional resistance to installing elevators. It is difficult for low-level and high-level tenants to reconcile their demands.

To resolve this conflict, the government can only be the "old uncle". As far as Chengcheng is concerned, the city has issued the "Practical Opinions on Facilitating the Self-determination of Existing Residences and Adding Elevators (Trial)", as long as the charter has the approval of more than two-thirds of the total construction area and three-thirds of the total number of owners Second, the above owners agree that the installation of an elevator can be manipulated, but in essence, as long as some residents express their veto, it will be difficult to move forward. If there is no trusted third party on both sides to reconcile such conflicts, and relying solely on the households themselves, the two sides will always argue from the perspective of their own benefits, and the conflicts will be difficult to deal with.

This third-party energy is the lower government. In matters involving their respective benefits, the role of the government should indeed study the correct demands of both sides, so that both sides can be profitable in installing elevators. At present, in some places, the cost of installing elevators is all allocated by the residents. The elevator, which should belong to the public equipment, seems to have succeeded in the exclusive wealth of the payer. If the residents on the lower floors want to use them, they will be rejected by the upper floors. There will be new conflicts. Elevators still need daily maintenance during operation, and disputes will arise on how to pay by the hour

With financial support for installing elevators, residents should bear some burdens while enjoying the benefits. May wish to imitate the economic and practical housing mechanism and give affirmative authority restrictions to the beneficiary owners. For high-rise residents in old buildings where the government funded the installation of elevators, their high-rise residences will increase in value. Therefore, the regulations can be used for self-occupation and subletting within a certain period of time. Resale demand will pay a certain percentage of rent and sale payment to supplement In the maintenance fund of the entire building.